The most award winning
healthcare information source.
TRUSTED FOR FOUR DECADES.
Optimizing Outcome in the Adult and Pediatric Burn Patient
Author: Sidney Miller, MD, FACS, Professor of Surgery; Director, The Ohio State University Burn Center, The Ohio State University College of Medicine University Hospitals, Columbus.
Peer Reviewer: Carl Menckhoff, MD, FACEP, FAAEM, Associate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta.
Burns may range from a minor injury from a brief contact with hot water to a life-threatening, devastating injury. Burns may be obvious or subtle depending on the mechanism and type of force producing the injury. The early recognition and aggressive management of even the smallest burn makes a significant impact on the outcome of each individual patient, especially in terms of function.
Acute care providers need to be able to aggressively resuscitate a major burn victim and at the same time recognize small burns that may benefit, either based on location or type of burn, from management by a specialist at a burn center. Being aware of burn center resources and appropriate utilization of this available expertise facilitates an optimal outcome in an acutely burned patient.
Fires and related burn injuries are a major issue in health care. The U.S. Fire Administration data shows that in 2006, 3,245 civilians lost their lives as the result of fire.1 There were 16,400 civilian injuries that occurred as the result of fire; 81% of all civilian fire deaths occurred in residences, and 106 firefighters were killed while on duty. Direct property loss due to fires was estimated at $11.3 billion. In 524,000 structural fires, there were 2,705 deaths and 14,350 injuries, resulting in $9.6 million dollars of direct loss.2,3 The U.S. Fire Administration/National Fire Data Center report on fatal fires estimated that there were 3,300 fatal fires that claimed 3,380 civilian lives (86% involved single fatalities, 14% involved multiple fatalities).4 Seventy-four percent of fatal fires occurred in structures; 94% of these were on residential properties. The leading cause of fires that resulted in fatalities was arson (27%), followed by smoking (18%). Smoke alarms were either not present or not functional in 63% of residential fires.
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) of the Department of Health and Human Services outcomes data for 2005 for burn injuries in the United States shows 40,687 hospital discharges.5 The mean length of stay was 7.1 days, mean charges were $41,000, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 2.4%. This represents $1.67 billion in health care cost annually for the management of patients with burns. Of this care, 28.7% was provided under private insurance; however, Medicare and Medicaid paid for 42% of care, and this government expenditure represents $709 million. Additionally, uninsured patients, whose costs are passed on to other insurers, represented 15% for $245 million; however, this figure does not represent the entire uninsured group, as many burn patients in most states qualify for Medicaid because of the magnitude of their burn injuries.
Thermal burns may result from contact with flames, hot liquids, hot surfaces, and other sources of intense heat; chemical burns and electrical burns may also occur. In addition, mass casualties and disasters, explosions, and fires can cause a variety of serious injuries, including burns. Prevention and planning are vital; the public must understand how to behave safely in mass casualty and fire situations and to comprehend basic principles of first aid for burn victims, as immediate care can be lifesaving. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indicates that only 60% of Americans have an escape plan, and of those, only 25% have practiced it.6 The CDC estimates that smoke alarms cut the chances of dying in a fire in half.6
This article discusses the initial evaluation and management of the burn patient and summarizes the current approach to these patients.
Initial Evaluation and Management of the Burn Patient
The initial evaluation and management of the burn patient frequently establishes the path for hospitalization and ultimate outcome. Decisions made during the first few hours after injury can have long-term effects on both the functional and cosmetic outcomes.
The goals in the initial management of the burn patient are:
1. A thorough evaluation, as with any trauma patient;
2. Evaluation and management of any traumatic associated injuries that might produce life-threatening hemorrhage, such as fractures, intra-abdominal hem- orrhage, and chest trauma;
3. Appropriate evaluation of the status of the burn wound;
4. Determination of the appropriate management course for the patient;
5. Differentiation of whether hospital or ambulatory care is most appropriate; and
6. Initiation of appropriate hospital care, if needed, or arrangement for follow-up care.
The first step in the treatment of any burn is to stop the burning process. All clothing should promptly be removed and a complete examination performed, making sure to include the patient's front and back. Attention should be paid to safeguard the safety of the health care provider as well as the victim, especially in the case of chemical injuries.
The mechanism of the injury is important in the evaluation and management of the burn patient. A patient burned in a closed space has a high possibility for an inhalation injury. If the patient was burned in a motor vehicle crash or explosion, associated traumatic injuries must be considered. Scald burns differ depending on the source. Boiling water can quickly run off the patient, tending to burn less deeply than hot grease, which adheres to the skin and retains the heat as it slowly cools.
An initial primary survey should be performed to determine the presence of any life-threatening injuries. The primary patient survey includes the "ABCs" of airway, breathing, and circulation. The airway must be assessed and established as patent. A history of being burned in a closed space, facial burns, or soot in the oropharyngeal area suggests a possible inhalation injury. Chest x-rays and blood gases are of little use during this early time period; however, if there is delay in establishing the airway until the patient has obvious evidence of respiratory distress, such as wheezing, or severe respiratory distress, oral intubation may not be possible and a cricothyrotomy or tracheostomy may need to be performed. If signs of an inhalation injury are present and there is a question as to the need for intubation, a bronchoscopy can be performed to assess the status of the airway and, if needed, an endotracheal tube can be inserted. Experience has shown that early placement of an endotracheal tube may avoid a very difficult surgical airway later. The largest tube possible should be placed, at least 7.0 or higher in adults, and in general any patient who requires intubation should be bronchoscoped. Findings on bronchoscopy are prognostic of the extent of the injury and help identify patients who might be extubated early.7
Once the airway has been established, attention is turned to the patient's breathing. The lungs must be inflating and the chest fully expanding. Occasionally, a leathery, full-thickness burn encircling the chest will limit excursion of the chest wall, impairing full expansion of the lungs. In such cases, a chest escharotomy may be needed to allow for proper chest wall expansion. In addition, evidence of possible chest trauma, including rib fractures, hemopneumothorax, tension pneumothorax, or flail chest, must be sought and effectively treated.
Any uncontrolled hemorrhage must then be identified and managed. Circulation is supported by the administration of appropriate intravenous (IV) fluids. The amount is based on the burn size estimate and the patient's weight. Two large-bore IVs should be started in the most readily accessible locations; while effort should be made to avoid insertion through any burn area, if patient has extensive burns IVs may need to be started through the burned areas. The patient with a major burn will need to have a Foley catheter inserted so that the adequacy of the fluid resuscitation can be monitored. The "D" in the "ABCDEs" of initial evaluation signifies examining for any disability. The "E" stands for exposing the patient and monitoring the environment, which should be warm to avoid hypothermia in the cold environment of most emergency departments. Initial management should include assessment of any associated injuries, if present. Early deaths in burn patients are usually due to one or more associated injuries. The burn injury itself rarely produces severe hypotension and shock except in extreme circumstances, and other sources of undetected hemorrhage or internal injuries must be sought.
Once the airway is established, the patient is breathing adequately, and access to and support of the circulation is established, the secondary survey is performed. The secondary survey encompasses a complete head-to-toe evaluation of the patient. Only after all of the immediate life-threatening problems have been managed during the primary survey can a complete history and physical examination can be performed.
After the primary and secondary trauma surveys have been completed, attention can be turned to the burn wound. The extent of the burn wound must be determined, as well as any associated medical conditions that might adversely affect the patient's outcome. Generally, patients with major burns, which the American Burn Association (ABA) defines as greater than 20% of the body surface area (or greater than 10% in the young and elderly), will require treatment for the effects of burn-wound shock.8
The depth of the burn wound is dependent on the temperature and duration of contact of the burning agent. The burn injury rarely is uniform in depth and frequently will have a central area of maximal damage with skin necrosis (zone of necrosis) that is surrounded by a zone of sluggish blood flow referred to as the zone of stasis. More peripherally is the zone of hyperemia, with increased blood flow secondary to the systemic response to the burn injury. In the central zone of necrosis, cellular damage is irreversible and a variety of toxic substances and electrolytes are released into the general circulation. Because of capillary dilation and the local inflammatory response to these released cytokines, fluid and serum proteins are lost from the intravascular space into extravascular space (the "third-space effect"), leading to hypovolemia, hypoalbuminemia, and hypotension. In the zone of stasis, the relatively sluggish blood flow produces cellular hypoxia and acidosis that leads to further hypotension and platelet clumping and, ultimately, to cellular necrosis. This is magnified with prolonged hypotension and shock. The zone of hyperemia is characterized by increased blood flow, with a diversion of blood from the central circulation that further decreases blood flow to vital organs. If circulation remains poor for any reason, or if tissue ischemia and necrosis develop in the area of stasis, additional tissue death will occur and the central zone of necrosis will expand. Therefore, the goals of burn resuscitation are to treat overall hypovolemia, maintain the local capillary circulation to the remaining viable tissues, and reestablish blood flow to vital end organs.
The severity of the burn is a combination of the extent and depth of the burn, the mechanism of the injury, pre-existing medical conditions that might complicate or delay wound healing, and associated injuries. The initial assessment of the extent of the burn is best determined by using a body diagram or chart to estimate burn size. Commonly, the Rule of 9s is used because it is easy to remember.9 (See Figure 1.) The body surface of an adult is divided into 11 segments of 9% each, or multiples of 9%, with 1% reserved for the perineum. There are two segments for each leg, two each for the anterior and posterior thorax, one for each arm, and one for the head. When using the Rule of 9s in children, 9% is taken from the legs and added to the head for a child up to age 1 year. Each subsequent year, 1% is returned to the legs until, at approximately age 9, the child's head is in proportion to that of an adult's. For smaller or scattered areas, the palm of the patient's hand, which represents approximately 1% of the patient's body surface, is used to estimate burn size. The more detailed Lund and Browder chart can be used to estimate burn size as, particularly in children, it may be more accurate. The use of these two methods is just about evenly divided among burn units. This suggests that there is not a standard for use of either the Rule of 9s or the Lund and Browder chart, except by facility preference.9
It should be noted that these calculations are only estimates, and that superficial burns that are just pink or red, such as sunburn, are not used in the calculation. Only partial-thickness and full-thickness areas of burn are used in estimating the extent of burn.
Since many decisions regarding care, both during and after hospitalization, are based on these "estimates," they should be recorded as accurately as possible and performed by skilled staff. Frequently, hospital staffing and reimbursement are based on these estimates. Unfortunately, objective and accurate methods of estimating burn size and depth are lacking, and much research is being performed in this area.
Equally important in the evaluation of the magnitude of the burn injury is estimating the depth of the burn. Burns are described as partial thickness or full thickness. This classification more truly represents the pathophysiologic status of the injury rather than the older first-, second-, and third-degree classification. (See Figure 2.) A partial-thickness burn involves only a portion of the dermis, and those dermal elements such as sweat glands and hair follicles necessary for re-epithelization of the burn wound remain intact. These skin appendages are necessary for healing of the partial-thickness burn and must have their capillary blood supply maintained by adequate resuscitation. If this blood supply is lost, the surviving appendages will die. In addition to inadequate resuscitation, infection can lead to loss of skin appendages and conversion of a partial-thickness to a full-thickness burn. With the partial-thickness burn, the nerve fibers to the dermis also are preserved. Therefore, the partial thickness burn wound is wet, painful, and blanches with pressure. With the full-thickness burn, all dermal elements have been destroyed, and except for those that involve only a very small area, will require skin grafting. The full-thickness burn is dry, leathery, and insensate.
Following stabilization, a detailed past medical history is essential. Since the major burn injury is still one of the few tetanus-prone injuries, it is important to determine the date of the patient's most recent tetanus immunization. The American College of Surgeons' guidelines should be followed.10 Tetanus guidelines suggest that if the patient's immunization status is unknown or if the patient has not had the recommended three doses of immunization, both tetanus toxoid and tetanus immunoglobulin should be given. If the patient has had a full three-dose immunization series, tetanus toxoid should be given if it has been longer than five years since the last booster.
Debate continues regarding the use of nasogastric decompression. Generally, if there will be a delay in transfer of the major burn patient or if the patient will need to be transferred over a long distance, the stomach should be decompressed with a nasogastric tube to avoid the possibility of vomiting and aspiration while en route. Gastric ileus, however, can usually be completely avoided by instituting tube feedings or an oral diet within four to six hours of the burn injury, when possible.
Associated illnesses have a significant impact in the physiologically compromised burn patient. The patient with pre-existing cardiac or renal disease may have additional difficulties with the large fluid requirements of a major burn. The diabetic patient or the patient on corticosteroids is more prone to infections. Additionally, the diabetic patient frequently has peripheral microvascular disease leading to poor wound healing.
Resuscitation of Patients with Major Burns
The primary objectives of fluid resuscitation are to maintain capillary circulation to the potentially viable skin and to support the circulation to vital organs. The estimate of the burn size is used to determine a starting point for resuscitation. Resuscitation is started with crystalloid, usually lactated Ringer's solution, which most closely resembles intravascular serum lost into the extracellular space. The most commonly used formula to determine initial fluid replacement is the Parkland formula, which estimates the IV fluid needs during the first 24 hours after the burn injury as [4 mL crystalloid ´ the percentage body surface area burned ´ weight in kg]. (See Table 1.) Generally, half of this estimated amount is given over the first eight hours after the injury and half during the next 16 hours, but the rate of fluid administration needs to be adjusted to maintain a urine output of 30-50 mL per hour in adults (1-1.5 mL/kg in children). Fluid overload is associated with increased cardiac strain, and cerebral and pulmonary edema is as harmful as hypovolemia. The balance between adequate fluid resuscitation and minimizing overload is critical and challenging to achieve.
Ongoing monitoring is very important. Patients with normal mental status should remain alert and oriented and have an appropriate glomular filtration rate as reflected by an adequate urine output.
Ventilated patients frequently require monitoring of arterial blood gases, typically through an arterial line. Initial resuscitation is started with two large-bore peripheral lines that are usually replaced with a central line at the burn center. Routine use of Swan-Ganz catheter is not recommended, however, as the mechanical trauma across the tricuspid valve can lead to nearly always fatal acute bacterial endocarditis.7
The hematocrit, serum osmolality, and serum sodium are routinely monitored. These three tests are additional indicators of the adequacy of fluid resuscitation. Ideally, the hematocrit should be less than 55%, the osmolality less than 350 mOsm, and the serum sodium less than 155 mEq/liter. By maintaining the appropriate electrolyte levels and urine output, adequate fluid resuscitation for the burn patient is assured, and fluid overload can be avoided.
Burns of Special Concern
The overwhelming majority of burns seen are thermal in nature. Electrical and chemical burns, however, are unique and provide very special challenges to the health care provider.
Electrical Injuries. Electrical injuries may be deceptively subtle injuries; there can be tissue damage from the passage of the electric current as well as burn from the ignition of clothing or other materials. Internal injury is a major concern with electrical injury, since the electrical current will pass through the entire body and can produce difficult-to-detect internal injuries. This passage of electrical current has multiple effects. Electric current can cause contraction and fibrillation of both skeletal and cardiac muscle, destruction of cell membranes, thrombosis of blood vessels, and coagulation necrosis of tissues. The violent contraction of the muscles caused by the passage of the current can produce fractures that may go undetected in the early resuscitation period.
Injured muscles discharge electrolytes and myoglobin into the bloodstream, which have the potential to produce further damage, and released potassium can produce cardiac arrhythmias; cardiac monitoring is mandatory. Myoglobin released from the damaged muscle mechanically plugs the renal tubules and can lead to renal failure. In patients who have myoglobinuria, a higher-than-usual urine output is desired to flush the myoglobin from the renal tubules. These patients have a port-wine-colored urine in the emergency department, and IV fluids must be administered at a rate to produce a urine output of 100-150 mL/hour until the urine grossly clears of myoglobin. Occasionally, an osmotic diuretic may be given to increase urine output and further flush out the myoglobin.
The passage of the electrical current also produces heat, which is produced by the resistance of the various tissues to the passage of the electrical current. Bone has the highest resistance to the passage of the electrical currents; therefore, a large amount of heat is produced in the bone and the surrounding muscle with no apparent injury to the overlying skin. Necrotic muscle needs to be fully debrided, as it is an excellent medium for bacterial colonization and infection. Amputation is a frequent sequela of extensive electrical injuries.
Chemical Injuries. Chemical burns, like thermal burns, usually involve just the skin. The initial management is dilution by continuous showering for a prolonged period after the injury. Attempts to neutralize the chemical can have an adverse effect and produce further tissue injury. The mixture of a strong acid and a strong base produces an exothermic reaction with further heat production and tissue damage. Knowing the actual chemical producing the injury is important, as many chemicals, particularly industrial chemicals, will require specific treatments or have significant systemic effects when absorbed through the skin. Hydrogen fluoride, a commonly used agent in glass and metal etching, bonds to the subcutaneous tissues and continues to produce damage until neutralized with calcium gluconate. If the injury occurs at work, it is important that any involved chemicals are identified, and that the container of the chemical is brought with the patient to the emergency department for proper identification.
Indications for Hospitalization of the Burn Patient
The American Burn Association has established guidelines for referral of burn patients to tertiary care facilities.8 (See Tables 2 and 3.) Usually, any patient with a burn involving greater than 20% of the total body surface should be hospitalized. In the young and old, who are less tolerant of burn injuries, a total body burn of 10% warrants hospitalization, and any patient with more than a 5% full-thickness burn should be referred and managed with primary excision, usually within five days of the injury. This is euphemistically referred to as the "5/10/20 rule" of burn care.
Other indications for hospitalization include complicating medical conditions such as diabetes, heart disease, and associated injuries. These affect or delay recovery or place the patient at a higher risk. Because of the special needs of patients with significant or circumferential burns involving the perineum, hands, feet, and face, they should be considered for hospitalization even though the burn size might be relatively small. Due to their functional importance, burns of the hands and feet are critical and their management should take place in a burn center, where personnel have experience in caring for these injuries.
Nonsurgical Care of the Burn Patient
The majority of burn patients can be managed with non-operative care. Generally, smaller burns of less then 10% of the body surface area that do not involve critical areas such as the face, hands, feet, or perineum can be managed on an outpatient basis. The three issues that should be addressed in the management of these patients are wound management, pain control, and follow-up care. Wound management is probably the easiest of the three to deal with. Since the early 1970s, effective topical antibiotics for the management of the burn wound have been readily available. Silver sulfadiazine (SSD) cream is most commonly used, as it is painless on application, easy to remove, covers a broad range of skin surface organisms, and is relatively inexpensive. SSD, however, has been shown to delay wound healing and must be changed at least once or twice daily until the wound is healed.11 The wound should be covered with an absorbent dressing that is held in place with roller gauze and/or an ace bandage. Over the past several years, a number of newer silver-containing wound care products have come on the market. Most of these are designed to be applied and left in place for up to a week while the wound heals underneath. Once they have stuck to the wound, the wound usually can be left open to the air. Because the twice-daily dressing changes with SSD are eliminated, pain can usually be controlled with acetaminophen, aspirin, or other NSAID. Elevation of the extremities will aid with both swelling and pain control, and the majority of these outpatients do not need narcotic pain medication.
Smaller burns, generally less then 10% of body surface area, usually can be treated on an outpatient basis. Blisters should be left intact. Those blisters that have opened should be debrided. The wounds should be cleansed with mild soap and water twice daily. Usually, facial burns can be left exposed and covered with a thick layer of triple-antibiotic ointment. The usual topical creams are very drying for the face, head, and neck areas, but can be used on other areas of the body. A well-applied absorbent dressing should be positioned and usually can most easily be held in place with elastic bandages. Limb elevation not only helps to control edema, but also is an important aspect of pain management. Outpatient care can be coordinated with the regional burn center for addressing any questions or concerns. Appropriate follow-up is important to the management of these outpatient burns and frequently is encountered as an area of concern. Many general practitioners neither have the expertise nor the time necessary for dressing changes in the office for other than the smallest-size burns. Many hospitals, however, have wound care centers that can comfortably manage these outpatients, even those with larger-surface-area burns. The regional burn center will almost always have an outpatient component and frequently is the best site for the management for these patients.
Pain management is a major issue with the burned patient. During the early resuscitative phase of patient management, blood flow to the skin is disrupted for a number of reasons that alter the absorption of intramuscular or subcutaneously delivered pain medication. The neuron-hormonal response to the loss of intravascular fluid volume during the shock phase redirects blood flow to the central core to support blood flow to vital organs. Additionally, subsequent edema development as fluids leak from the intravascular space to the extravascular space during this shock phase (third-space effect) hinders the absorption of intramuscularly administered medication. Judicious use of IV pain medication is indicated during this period.12 Pain medications may be titrated to control pain and avoid adverse reactions. Pain scores and response to medication should be recorded and monitored.
After the initial burn shock period, the magnitude of the individual patient's pain response may differ. In the very young and very old, pain management can be challenging, as the response of patients in these two groups can be quite variable. With the major burn patient who is admitted to the hospital, pain management takes two forms. The first is management of background pain; this type of pain is generally constant pain that is present until wound closure has occurred, which might be several weeks to months. Once the patient is able to tolerate oral pain management, a long-acting narcotic such as methadone is started and titrated to manage this background pain. Shorter-acting narcotic and NSAIDs also are used to supplement the effects of the long-acting agents.
Episodic pain occurs with specific activities such as dressing changes and wound or extremity manipulation during the necessary physical and occupational therapy required during recovery. Control of this episodic pain is quite variable and dependent on many factors, including how stoic the patient is, past experiences with pain management or drug use, or pre-existing, chronic, painful conditions that might compound the management episodic pain during this particular period of time. A variety of pain management methodologies are employed, including small doses of IV medication, oral pain medications, and the liberal use of anxiolytic agents. The goal is to use the smallest amount of pharmacologic agents as possible to control this episodic pain. Alternative pain management, including music therapy, imagery, and virtual reality, has also been of value.10-12
The hallmark of pain management in the outpatient setting is a well-applied wound dressing and limb elevation to decrease dependent edema during the early phase after the burn injury. NSAID agents or acetaminophen are the mainstay of outpatient management. Again, the needs of any particular patient will be influenced by his or her past experience with pain and drug usage, although oral narcotics may be needed for breakthrough pain.
Surgical Care of the Burn Patient
Escharotomy. During the early post-burn period, the patient's extremities may appear pale, feel cool, and exhibit poor capillary refill due to shunting of blood from the periphery to the central core. Once proper resuscitation is initiated and the peripheral circulation is re-established, there is release of a variety of inflammatory mediators. These mediators lead to transudation of intravascular fluids into the extravascular space with the loss of fluids and proteins, producing local swelling. As this swelling occurs in the area of the full-thickness burn, with its rigid and unyielding overlying eschar, compartment syndrome can develop and the adequacy of the peripheral circulation must constantly be monitored. In patients with circumferential burns of the extremities, this is especially concerning and the practitioner should be vigilant for signs of developing compartment syndrome. While usually a late sign, any loss of pulses would certainly suggest vascular compromise.
An escharotomy performed with a scalpel or by electrocautery through the full-thickness burn to the subcutaneous fat allows this rigid tissue to expand and releases the constricting pressure on the underlying vessels. While this should be a painless procedure, as it is usually through an area of full-thickness burn, there is frequently brisk venous bleeding that can be managed with a bulky dressing and elevation of the extremity. Figure 3 shows a chest escharotomy performed to improve ventilation in patients with circumferential chest burns. Figure 4 is a chart of escharotomy sites for extremities and the chest. With extremity escharotomies, peripheral pulses should be re-established, and with chest escharotomies, airway pressures should decrease. Local or regional anesthesia usually is not necessary.
Wound Coverage. The classical management of burns for centuries involved waiting for the eschar to separate naturally from the underlying subcutaneous tissue, with subsequent skin grafting, one of the oldest surgical procedures. This eschar separation was due to subeschar infection and liquefaction of the nonviable tissue by bacterial proteolytic enzymes. Sepsis was common, as the bacteria trapped beneath the eschar frequently gained access to the systemic circulation. Since the 1960s, effective topical antibiotics that actively penetrate the eschar have been available. Their use, however, delays eschar separation. Delayed eschar separation results in lengthened patient hospitalization and recovery.
In 1970, Janzekovic published on a series of patients treated with early excision and grafting.13 The rationale was that the earlier the dead skin was removed, the faster the wound would heal. Excision done within the first 3-4 days resulted in an excellent take of skin grafts, lower sepsis rates, and shorter hospitalizations. If the patient enters the burn unit late or with burn wounds already heavily colonized, skin grafting may result in loss of the skin graft and should be postponed until the bacteria count is acceptable.
Primary excision has become the standard in the management of burn patients, with removal of all nonviable burned skin either by using a dermatome, scalpel, or electrocautery. Excision can be tangential, sequential, or full-thickness. Once the eschar is removed, the next important stage of surgical management of a burn patient is wound coverage.
There are several alternatives to achieve wound closure, the most efficient being to excise the burn wound and suture the skin closed. This is an acceptable method for some small burns and frequently is overlooked. Small burns managed in this fashion usually heal with minimal scarring, and the procedure can be performed on an outpatient basis.
With burns of less than 20% of the body surface area, there is usually an adequate supply of donor sites for skin grafting and wound coverage. Small full-thickness burns might be allowed to heal on their own, as the base frequently is too small to support a skin graft. Larger full-thickness burns and deep partial-thickness burns that are estimated to take longer than three weeks to heal require skin grafting. Burns requiring skin grafting usually are managed by early total excision, although wound coverage sometimes can become an issue because of the lack of available donor sites. With smaller-area burns requiring skin grafting, cosmetic and functional areas such as hands and faces are addressed first. With larger-area burns, patient survival is the first priority, and skin grafting follows certain other priorities. The wound should be closed as quickly as possible to decrease the risk of colonization of the necrotic skin and the chance of systemic sepsis. Wound closure is accomplished most easily in large, flat surfaces such as the chest, abdomen, and anterior upper and lower extremities. With early excision and good skin graft adherence, the total burn size is decreased gradually to a smaller, nonlethal size. Coverage of the burn wound with autografts depends on the extent and location of the wound and the amount of donor skin available. Grafts may be applied as "sheet" grafts, whereby a strip of skin is removed from a donor site and transferred without alteration. Sheet grafts are more durable and produce better cosmesis than meshed grafts, which is particularly beneficial for coverage of areas exposed to shearing forces or the environment such as hands, neck, arms, and face.
With large wounds, however, the available donor sites frequently are insufficient to cover the excised area. An early attempt to expand the amount of available skin was made by using "pinch" grafts, in which many small, fingertip-size grafts were used to cover the burn wound. In 1964, Tanner described a meshing devise that cuts small holes in the graft and allows for expansion of the harvested skin graft to allow for coverage of large wounds.14 The expansion ranges from 2:1 up to 9:1, and experimental expansions of up to 100:1 have been studied in the laboratory.15,16 The 9:1 expansion is very difficult to work with and infrequently used; 2:1 to 4:1 are used most commonly. The pattern of the meshed skin graft will remain when the graft heals; therefore, every effort is made to avoid the use of meshed grafts on the face, neck, and hands. Donor sites generally heal in 10-14 days and can be re-harvested three or four times. Because donor sites resemble partial-thickness burns, they are usually painful, but with the newer donor-site dressings this pain usually subsides in 3-4 days.
As the application of primary excision has expanded, additional methods of expanded mesh grafting have been developed. One of these is a cultured skin substitute called cultured epithelial autograft (CEA).17 CEA is used when large, total body surface area burns (generally greater the 50%) require coverage and patients do not have enough donor skin available. A small piece of unburned skin is excised and keratinocytes are grown in a laboratory. These grafts take several weeks to grow, during which time patients are at risk for infection. Although cultured keratinocytes provide more material to cover the patient's wounds, they are less durable than autografts, as they contain no dermal elements. Several additional models are being developed in the laboratory that either grow epithelial grafts earlier on a fibroblast matrix to increase durability, or in which liquid keratinocyte cultures are applied in a spray fashion in the early post-burn period. The keratinocytes spray is under clinical evaluation.
Aggressive, early excision has stimulated a market for a variety of biological and biosynthetic products. These products include allogeneic cadaver skin, human allogeneic dermis, and the "artificial" skin Integraä (Integra Lifesciences Corp., Plainsboro, NJ), which is a biosynthetic two-part construct of shark cartilage and bovine collagen with an outer silicone sheet.18 With proper care, once Integraä "takes," at about 3-4 weeks the outer silicone sheet is removed and a skin graft is applied. It is unclear whether the Integraä survives long term or merely serves as a strut for the in-growth of the patients' own fibroblasts. Motion and infection are the primary causes of Integra loss, and the vacuum-assisted closure devise has proved beneficial in improving Integraä assimilation.
The biologic dressings also include porcine or other species xenografts. Amnion is an excellent biologic dressing, but its use has been limited in recent years due to the potential risks of hepatitis and HIV transmission.19
A variety of biosynthetic dressings have been developed to temporarily cover the excised full-thickness burn or the partial-thickness wound and promote wound healing. Temporary wound coverings provide a protective barrier either while donor sites heal for future harvesting, until Integraä is ready for grafting, or for primary coverage of partial-thickness burns. One major advantage of these temporary dressings is that many can be left in place over the partial-thickness wound until it heals, eliminating painful, twice-daily dressing changes. Many of the new synthetic wound coverings have characteristics of biologic coverings, and most are some form of synthetic matrix such as silicone with biologic components such as bovine collagen. Many also have some form of silver ions applied to them, which have antibacterial effects.
The ultimate goal of surgical management is to achieve a functional, durable, and cosmetically acceptable skin surface. Early surgery in the burn patient involves removal of the full-thickness burn and its replacement either with the patient's own skin (autografts) or one of a number of temporary biological or biosynthetic dressings. Patients with large burns will require multiple operations to cover their wounds and may require multiple reconstructive procedures to achieve maximal cosmetic and functional outcomes.
Recently, some patients undergoing elective cosmetic surgery after effective weight-reduction surgery have offered to donate "extra" skin to burn centers, either from good Samaritan desires or for imagined financial gains. These donations are very problematic, and most burn and tissue centers have refused such offers.
The management of the acute burn injury provides the framework for patient survival and sets the entire course of their hospitalization. Assessments made during this period will have a far-reaching effect on the resultant disability or function that the patient might experience.
The burn patient always must be approached with a complete assessment, just like any other trauma patient. This includes the ABCs of airway, breathing, and circulation, and the recognition of associated life-threatening injuries. A past medical history of any illnesses that might complicate the healing of the burn wound should be obtained. The burn wound needs to be properly assessed for depth and extent to determine the course of treatment. IV fluid replacement needs are calculated from the size estimate.
Hospitalization and the need for referral to a regional burn center should be determined using American Burn Association guidelines. (See Tables 2 and 3.) The surgical management of these patients has become quite complicated, with early excision being effectively applied to improve patient survival, shorten hospital stays, and improve patient outcomes.
1. U.S. Fire Administration (http://www.usfa.dhs.gov/index.shtm).
2. Karter MJ. National Fire Protection Association. Fire Loss in the United States During 2006. www.nfpa.org/assets/files/PDF/OS.fireloss.pdf. Accessed on 8/20/08.
3. U.S. Fire Administration. Firefighter Fatalities in the United States in 2006. July 2007. http://www.usfa.dhs.gov/downloads/pdf/publications/ff_fat06.pdf. Accessed on 8/20/08.
4. U.S. Fire Administration/National Fire Data Center. Fatal Fires: Topical Fire Research Series. March 2005, 5(1). http://www.usfa.dhs.gov/downloads/pdf/tfrs/v5i1.pdf. Accessed on 8/20/08.
5. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) of the Department of Health and Human Services. http://hcupnet.ahrq.gov/HCUPnet.jsp. Accessed on 8/20/08.
6. The Center for Disease Control's Report on Mass Casualties (http://emergency.cdc.gov/masscasualties/burns.asp).
7. Review of mortality experience with an emphasis on early vs. late deaths and inhalation vs. non-inhalation injuries. Paper presented at ISBI Congress Meeting, San Francisco, CA on Sept. 2, 1982.
8. Resources for the Optimal Care of the Injured Patients: 1999. Committee on Trauma, American College of Surgeons. 1998. Chapter 14, pp. 55-62.
9. Miller SF, Finley RK, Waltman M, et al. Burn size estimate reliability: A study. J Burn Care Rehabil 1991;12:546-559.
11 Stern HS. Silver sulphadiazine and the healing of partial thickness burns: A prospective clinical trial. Br J Plast Surg 1989;42: 581-585.
12. de Jong AE, Middelkoop E, Faber AW, Van Loey NE. Non-pharmacological nursing interventions for procedural pain relief in adults with burns: A systematic literature review. Burns 2007;33: 811-827.
13. Janzekovic Z. A new concept of the early excision and immediate grafting of burns. J Trauma 1970;l0:1103-1108.
14. Tanner JC Jr, Vandeput J, Olley JF. The mesh skin graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 1964;34:287-292.
15. Mardovin W, Miller SF, Eppinger M, Finley RK, Micrografts: The "Super" Expansion Graft. J Burn Care Rehabil 1992;13:556-559.
16. Tuttle J, Miller SF, Bennett J, et al. Predictor of the morbidity and mortality in burn patients with inhalation injury. Paper presented at the American Burn Association meeting in Chicago on March 18-21, 1998.
17. Atiyeh BS, Costagliola M. Cultured epithelial autograft (CEA) in burn treatment: Three decades later. Burns 2007;33:405-413.
18 Heimbach DM, Warden GD, Luterman A, et al. Multicenter postapproval clinical trial of Integra dermal regeneration template for burn treatment. J Burn Care Rehabil 2003;24:42-48.
19 Singh R, Purohit S, Chacharkar MP, et al. Microbiological safety and clinical efficacy of radiation sterilized amniotic membranes for treatment of second-degree burns. Burns 2007;33:505-510.