The most award winning
healthcare information source.
TRUSTED FOR FOUR DECADES.
Self-harm in the Emergency Department: A Cry for Help, a Call to Arms
How's this for a practice gap? It's estimated that 1 in 10 suicide victims are people seen in the emergency department within 2 months of dying. Suicide is an issue of public health, which, in today's medical system, is often the domain of the emergency physician (EP).
Practically speaking, the questions useful for the emergency physician are: Which patients are at risk of suicide? Who stays, and who goes home? And in a broader sense, what can an emergency physician do to prevent successful suicide?
J. Stephan Stapczynski, MD, Editor
You are working a typical shift: Three patients have not been seen, the waiting room has four patients to be brought back, and you are just talking with a new patient when the triage nurse comes to you about a middle-aged patient whom she is seeing. The patient came by bus because she was feeling depressed and had thoughts of not living anymore. She has a history of depression and was under treatment, but has been out of work, out of medical insurance, and out of medications for over six months. Now that she is in the ED, she feels embarrassed and knows the wait will be a few hours, so she wants to leave. The triage nurse is asking what she should do. And you say?
The definition of self-harm is multi-faceted. In the emergency department (ED), an important distinction is between self-harm with and without intent to die.
The American Psychiatric Association (APA) offers a basic classification of terms.1 Suicidal ideation involves thoughts of serving as the agent of one's own death, and it may vary in gravity depending on the specificity of suicide plans and the degree of suicidal intent. The lethality of suicidal behavior is the objective danger to life associated with a suicide method or action as determined by the physician and is distinct from and may not always coincide with an individual's expectation of what is medically dangerous. For example, a patient may believe that swallowing a handful of Tylenol is no more lethal than ingesting a tube of toothpaste. Suicidal intent is subjective expectation and desire for a self-destructive act to end in death. Suicide, itself, is defined as self-inflicted death with evidence (either explicit or implicit) that the person intended to die, while a suicide attempt is self-injurious behavior with a nonfatal outcome, accompanied by evidence (either explicit or implicit) that the person intended to die. An aborted suicide attempt implies that the person intended to die but stopped the attempt before physical damage occurred. In contrast, deliberate self-harm is willful self-inflicting of painful, destructive, or injurious acts without intent to die.
Circumstances vary among patients who present to the ED with evidence of self-harm. Some are seemingly trivial acts that mask serious, underlying suicidal intent. Others are dramatic gestures intended to garner secondary gain. In general, these self-destructive behaviors exist along a continuum, and emergency providers should take all patients seriously.
At first glance, it may seem callous to consider a topic such as suicide in a mathematical and scientific manner. But the numbers help to show the significance of the problems. More than 33,000 Americans age 10 years or older die by suicide each year, making it the eleventh leading cause of death and fifth leading cause of years of potential life lost before age 65.2 Data from 2008 show that an estimated 8.3 million Americans had serious thoughts of suicide, and 900,000 made suicide plans and attempts.3 (See Table 1.) Anywhere from 395,000 to 535,000 people with self-inflicted injuries are treated in emergency departments every year,2,4 and the emergency department is the most common service used by people who harm themselves.2,4 Clearly, the scope of this problem is immense.
Data from the CDC indicates that suicide rates were gradually decreasing in the 1990s, but have since leveled off and are actually increasing among females. And while the rate of suicide is almost four times higher in males,2 some data suggest that females are more likely to think about, plan, and attempt suicide.3
Classically, older age has been associated with increased suicide risk, but recent trends show that, in both men and women older than 65, suicide rates have dropped dramatically. At the same time, rates have risen in people 25-64 years old, which now is the age group with the highest suicide rate.2 Women between the ages of 25 and 64 appear to have the sharpest increase in rate of suicide.2 And while people younger than age 25 have the lowest rates, suicide ranks as the third leading cause of death in people 10-24 years old.2
Males are more likely to use a firearm, while females resort to poisoning as their primary means. However, this trend varies by age, with people 10-24 more likely to die by suffocation and older people (especially men older than 65) more likely to use a firearm.2 The relative fatality of these methods has also been compared. Firearms and suffocation tend to be more fatal than poisoning or cutting. Falling is not a common method, but it tends to be relatively fatal. Case fatality is higher among males. It is important to consider the potential lethality of these processes when patients in the ED propose suicide plans.
Geographic location and ethnicity factor into suicide risk, as well. High-risk areas include the western and northwestern states, as well as the central part of the Midwest and certain parts of Florida and Michigan. Native Americans/Alaskans and Caucasians are almost three times as likely to commit suicide as people of other races.2
While age, sex, race, means of self-harm, and geographic location are all important in determining a patient's suicide risk, perhaps most relevant is the CDC's data regarding circumstances surrounding those who have committed suicide. Almost half (43.6%) of suicide victims had depressed mood at the time of their death, while 41.9 % had concurrent mental illness (twice as common in females). Female victims also were twice as likely to have had previous attempts. About one-third of victims had intimate partner problems, either left a suicide note or otherwise let their intent be known, or experienced crisis within the preceding 2 weeks. When patients present with self-injurious behavior or intent, determine whether these circumstances exist. These data can be used both to identify risk factors and protective factors and to differentiate patients who warrant intervention from those who can be sent home.
Suicide victims may or may not leave a note explaining why they committed the act. In fact, people have many reasons for thinking about and committing acts of self-harm. Usually, they are depressed individuals who are overwhelmed by feelings of hopelessness, guilt, or self-loathing. Some are seeking refuge from chronic pain or terminal illness, while others may have a mental illness that causes them to commit such acts. Often, suicide is attempted due to intense feelings of anger and can lead to murder-suicide, coinciding sex crimes, and other violent behavior. Chronic loneliness during childhood and history of sexual molestation are thought to lead to suicidal behavior later in life. Medications, like reserpine, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, and even some antidepressants, have been implicated, as well. During the past several years, the FDA has issued a series of warnings concerning the potential of various medications to lead to thoughts of suicide. (See Table 2.) The magnitude of this effect and its consequences have been debated by the various experts. The risk appears higher in children, adolescents, and adults younger than 24 years. The practical implications of the FDA warnings are that patients should be informed of this potential when started on these medications. Whatever the reason, it's thought that most people who think about suicide also maintain some sort of desire to live, which may be what brings them to the ED.5
For the EP, it is important to view the causes of suicidal behavior in terms of risk factors. (See Table 3.) The CDC has summarized the risk factors as follows:
family history of suicide
family history of child maltreatment
previous suicide attempt(s)
history of mental disorders, particularly depression
history of alcohol and substance abuse
feelings of hopelessness
impulsive or aggressive tendencies
cultural and religious beliefs (e.g., belief that suicide is a noble resolution of a personal dilemma)
local epidemics of suicide
isolation, a feeling of being cut off from other people
barriers to accessing mental health treatment
loss (relational, social, work, or financial)
easy access to lethal methods
unwillingness to seek help because of the stigma attached to mental health and substance abuse disorders or to suicidal thoughts.
These lists of risk factors do little to help the clinician with risk assessment, especially in a fast-paced environment like the ED, so attempts have been made to weigh the relative importance of these risk factors. The Suicide Resource Prevention Center (SRPC) has compiled "A Guide for ED Evaluation and Triage." This guide points out "signs of acute suicide risk," which include talking about suicide/thoughts of suicide, seeking lethal means to kill oneself, seeing no reason to live, anxiety/agitation, insomnia, substance abuse, hopelessness, social withdrawal, anger, recklessness, mood changes, previous attempt, triggering event (loss of relationship or job), and access to firearms. Among psychiatrists, the factors listed below have been touted as fundamental to risk assessment.6
Evidence suggests that more than 90% of suicide victims have a DSM-IV diagnosis, such as major depression, bipolar depression, schizophrenia, alcohol or drug abuse, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorder, bulimia or anorexia nervosa, or personality disorder (especially borderline or antisocial).7-9 Of these, mood disorders are most common. Patients with major depression are 20 times more likely to commit suicide than those without depression, and 15-20% do commit suicide, with hopelessness being the most ominous symptom.10-16 People with schizophrenia are almost 10 times more likely to commit suicide than those without the condition, and while providers should be wary of command hallucinations, suicide in these patients is more likely due to negative symptoms, such as hopelessness.17-21 Personality disorders are present in 40% of suicide victims.12 And while many psychiatric disorders increase the odds of having thoughts of suicide, recent evidence suggests that, after controlling for mental illness, only disorders characterized by anxiety and poor impulse-control predict which people act on their thoughts.22,23 Physicians should consider suicidal behavior in any patient with a psychiatric diagnosis to be a red flag.
Alcohol has been shown to increase the risk of suicide at least six-fold, especially when consumed in large amounts, while use of other drugs increases suicide risk to a lesser extent.24-28 While it may be difficult to screen every alcohol and drug abuser who walks through the door, think about suicide in these patients, particularly if mechanism of injury suggests self-harm.
It also is important to take note of certain historical points. Patients often mention a recent stressor or precipitant event, such as family turmoil or instability, health problems, loss of a relationship, or loss of money or employment.29 Higher suicide rates have been observed in those who are unemployed and underprivileged.30 These stressors may bring them to their primary care doctor,31 or, if they cannot afford insurance, to the EP. Some of the highest-risk patients live alone, are socially outcast or isolated, or otherwise lack social support.32,33 This may explain why widowed, divorced, and single people are at higher risk to commit suicide,34 so be particularly wary of the recently widowed or divorced. Identifying and treating patients with recent stressful events is critical because self-harm often is brought on by a reversible short-term crisis.5
Remember to ask about past suicide attempts. Be concerned if the patient's current situation mimics one in which a serious attempt was made. Some literature suggests that a history of multiple attempts places patients at higher risk, with added risk if the patient also has a suicide plan.35,36 Patients with a plan are more of a risk to complete suicide,13 so talk in detail with patients about the frequency, severity, and depth of their suicidal thoughts, as well as whether they have access to a weapon or other means. Ask where they have the weapon and whether they've taken it out or moved it recently.
And while most of the literature focuses on risk factors, there are protective factors, as well. The APA gives a list of these factors. The CDC offers a summary of these protective factors (see Table 4):
Effective clinical care for mental, physical, and substance abuse disorders;
Easy access to a variety of clinical interventions and support for help seeking;
Family and community support (connectedness);
Support from ongoing medical and mental health care relationships;
Skills in problem solving, conflict resolution, and nonviolent ways of handling disputes;
Cultural and religious beliefs that discourage suicide and support instincts for self-preservation.
The psychiatry literature has acknowledged a handful of these as being most important. There is even a "Reasons for Living Inventory," to be filled out by the patient, which has been created to help spot protective factors.37 Just as poor social support is a risk factor, good social support is protective, no matter who provides it.38 Many patients draw on religious belief for support, which has been shown to be a protective factor, with Catholics, Jews, and Protestants having the lowest suicide rates39; however, strength of belief is more protective than one's specific religion.40 In addition to gauging the extent of support systems, try to estimate patients' sense of duty to their families. This is particularly important in female patients, as presence and number of children decrease risk of suicide in women.41 People may mention they were on the brink of suicide but came to the ED after thinking about their children. Above all, ask patients about their reasons for living.
Just as there are many different potential causes of suicidal behavior, there are many ways that patients can present to the emergency department. Some simply will tell their doctor that they want to die. Others will come to the ED at around 11 p.m. on a Friday night, with knee pain and a normal exam, and maybe a flat affect.
Recognition of suicide potential depends on the type of patient who presents. It often helps to place patients in categories, be it depressed, elderly, male alcoholics, or teenagers with borderline personalities and fresh cut marks down their arms. Naturally, discussion of clinical features overlaps with talk about risk factors. The manner in which the patient presents also impacts clinical judgment. Patients presenting after an attempt or with clear suicidal ideation are considered differently from those with less obvious clinical pictures.
Unfortunately, there can be fundamental flaws in the way physicians approach patients who self-harm. Often, clinicians do one of two things. Either they "are overly cautious and assume that anyone who reports suicidal thoughts is at high risk for suicide," or they "underestimate suicidality through a dismissive attitude or inept assessment." The former "leads to unnecessary deprivation of patients' liberties and rights as well as to the squandering of scarce clinical resources," while the latter jeopardizes "patient safety and increase[s] physician liability should there be a negative outcome."6,42 Because suicide risk factors often have poor predictive value, and an ED visit is a mere snapshot of the overall clinical picture, the EP should err on the side of caution. If there is any doubt regarding patient safety, strongly consider admission and psychiatric consultation.
Assessing suicide potential can be easy in someone who has just made an attempt or who complains about depression and is clear about his or her intent. Other scenarios can mask suicide risk. Silent suicide occurs in patients who are "noncompliant" with treatment of their medical conditions. Think of the AIDS patient who does not take his or her medication, or more subtly, the patient with type 2 diabetes with poor glycemic control. Occult suicide occurs when injury, like a gunshot wound or fall from a height, occurs "by accident." And even if suicide gesture or intent is not obvious, address the potential for self-harm in all patients with chronic alcoholism, substance abuse, psychiatric disorder, and chronic illness.5
In patients who present after an attempt or with clear suicidal intent, start with a medical evaluation and treat accordingly. Ask the patient for specific details regarding the act. Patients may give an inconsistent or inaccurate history and sometimes refuse to speak, so question family members, friends, police, paramedics, and anyone else who may have information. The "Uses and Disclosures to Avert a Serious Threat to Health or Safety" exception to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) lets physicians disclose protected health information to these individuals "based on reasonable belief that use or disclosure of the protected health information was necessary to prevent or lessen a serious and imminent threat to health or safety of an individual or of the public."5
Initially, the history and physical examination should focus on the possibility of drug ingestion, trauma, and sequelae of associated illness. Take note of toxidromes. Examine the patient's ABCs, vital signs, mental status, pupils, and perform an appropriate neurologic exam. If altered mental status exists, attempt to determine whether the cause is functional or organic. Because a medical etiology goes unnoticed in up to 50% of acute psychiatric presentations,43 a careful history and examination are important.5
Further history should focus on risk factors. Unfortunately, many Emergency Nurses and physicians have poor suicide risk assessment skills, and there is no single, standard screening instrument for this purpose.44,45 The modified SAD PERSONS scale is widely used by EPs to evaluate key historical elements.5,46,47 (See Table 5.) Its use has enabled non-psychiatric medical staff to identify patients in need of specialist evaluation.48 Some EDs use this mnemonic to risk stratify patients in triage. With this approach, the training of triage nurses in risk assessment is imperative.49 Education of nurses improves attitude, confidence, competence, and reasoning skills when interacting with self injurers, and several cost-effective education programs have been implemented.44,50-52 Whether via SAD PERSONS or some other risk-assessment tool, the process of gauging suicide risk should begin in triage, and involved emergency personnel should be trained appropriately.
When it comes to risk stratifying patients, practitioners place more weight on some risk factors than others. The quality of risk assessment by EPs often is questioned and deemed inadequate.53-57 More recently, though, data suggest that most EPs do use key risk factors to direct their assessment. As would be expected, EPs perceive immediate risk factors, like lethality of method and active desire to die, as most critical. This is logical given the focus placed in the ED on immediate management of life threats. Most EPs give less consideration to background risk factors, such as psychiatric history and social situation. While this may be in line with current practice, to ensure the highest level of care, consider background risk factors when assessing patients who present with deliberate self-harm.58
Aside from asking about a suicide plan, previous attempts, access to a weapon, current thoughts of suicide, and some of the other issues already discussed, it is important to ask about the patient's attitude about surviving the attempt. Determine if the patient is sad or surprised to have survived. If the patient has taken precautions against being discovered or is found accidentally, it implies a failed serious attempt, so view this as a harbinger of continued self-injurious behavior. In general, attempts with lower likelihood of survival confer higher suicide risk, and vice versa.
People at high risk for self-harm who do not present with obvious suicidality warrant a slightly different approach. The first step is to use a sympathetic, nonjudgmental demeanor to establish a relationship with the patient. Direct questioning is necessary, but not until after a level of comfort is reached between patient and physician. Begin by evaluating the presenting complaint and pertinent history. After building rapport and getting a feel for the patient's medical, psychiatric, and social history, move on to more specific questions about depression and suicidal thoughts. Asking patients about suicide, contrary to rumor, does not appear to plant the thought in their heads. If they are at risk for self-harm, odds are they have had suicidal thoughts for a long time.5
Empathy may seem like an obvious priority, but attitudes toward self-harm in the ED vary among staff. Doctors, nurses, and other personnel often harbor negative attitudes about patients who self-harm, potentially compromising their care. In a fast-paced environment like the ED, with a focus on the critically ill, these patients are sometimes viewed as a drain on the system and a waste of resources. For many physicians, it is counterintuitive and frustrating to treat someone who, at least outwardly, does not want to be treated or saved. Yet, a physician trained in emergency medicine should excel at dealing with this sort of paradox. It seems that the stigma attached to suicide is fading and health care workers are realizing that an open, sympathetic approach is needed. Negative attitudes can be avoided by ensuring that all ED staff have proper training in management of patients with self-injurious behavior.44,59-70 View every patient who presents to the ED with self-harm as one who is there for help.
In cases of suicidality, there is no specific diagnostic test that can be used to risk stratify patients. Usually, in the case of self-harm, the diagnosis is clear, and diagnostic testing centers around the mechanism of injury. If the patient attempted hanging, then a CT angiogram of the neck may be necessary. Patients who have jumped from a height should receive a trauma evaluation. For toxic ingestion, the work-up should focus on the substance ingested as well as possible co-ingestants. Urine drug screen, serum alcohol, salicylate, and acetaminophen levels are usually a good idea, and most ingestions deserve an ECG (particularly if tricyclic antidepressant overdose is suspected). However, routine toxicologic screening is unnecessary for most patients with suicidal ideation. Toxic ingestions usually manifest with clinical signs. Some presentations do not warrant any testing, but psychiatric facilities accepting patients often require screening laboratory tests prior to transfer. Other than building trust between ED staff and accepting psychiatric consultants, there is little that can be done about this. In general, order the laboratory tests required for transfer.5,71,72
When encountering a patient with evidence of self-harm, differential considerations exist. Of primary focus are suicide attempts, gestures, and suicidal ideation of varying degrees. But also consider major depression, minor depression, cyclothymia, secondary gain, self mutilation without lethal intent, and other psychiatric conditions.71
Of note, secondary gain should be an absolute exclusionary diagnosis, and implies that while the patient's stated motive for self injury is death, the behavior actually meets another need or desire. Alternatively, their intent may be to avoid incarceration, legal prosecution, homelessness, and other personal issues.71,72
Self-mutilation and other forms of deliberate self-harm are also important to consider, but remember that deliberate self-harm is an independent risk factor for future suicide attempts. When in doubt, solicit assistance from mental health experts.71,72
Current practice with these patients can be just as unpredictable as the ED itself. As discussed, management is labile and depends on different clinical presentations with varying severities and treatment priorities. Still, a systematic, structured approach to these patients often leads to the best treatment plan.
Prehospital care should entail treatment of injuries and life threats, including potential harm from overdose. Some patients will be aggressive or may refuse to come to the hospital, in which case law enforcement officials may have to place patients in protective custody.5
Begin ED management of suicidal patients by evaluating for life threats and providing immediate stabilization. Provide constant monitoring and ensure the safety of the patient, staff, and others. Consider suicide precautions or chemical/physical restraint if necessary. Social restraints in which the patient is undressed and gowned, with his or her clothes and personal items secured, any potential harmful items removed, and a sitter close by can be effective in non-aggressive patients, particularly when the patient needs to leave the bed. After initial stabilization and treatment of injuries, seek out medical causes of the patient's state and manage accordingly. In most jurisdictions, profoundly uncooperative patients can be held or committed for a limited amount of time (approximately 72 hours). Do this only for patients who need evaluation and treatment and are either a threat to themselves or others, or are unable to care for themselves. Make every possible effort to promote voluntary admission. If all else fails, commit acutely suicidal patients and document thoroughly, following whatever process is required by the state.
EPs have voiced the need for a clinical decision rule (CDR) for admission of patients with suicide risk, ranking it among the top 10 issues needing a CDR, in a survey sent to members of the national emergency medicine associations in Australasia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States.73 The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) has general guidelines for approaching adult psychiatric patients, but nothing specific for those who self-harm.72 The Manchester Self Harm Rule, consisting of four questions, was compared to global assessment and showed higher sensitivity but lower specificity for predicting repeat self-harm or suicide, so it is useful only as an adjunct to global clinical assessment.74-76
The modified SAD PERSONS scale has been validated for use by non-psychiatric medical personnel and seems to be the current standard for risk assessment in the ED. (See Table 5.) Risk should be assessed initially in triage, followed by a more detailed mental health assessment addressing psychosocial needs by trained staff, ideally an experienced mental health professional.77 The EP's role is to determine the patient's likelihood of committing suicide if discharged and to decide between psychiatric hospitalization, emergency psychiatric consultation, and discharge. That said, even psychiatrists equipped with an armament of risk-assessment scales have difficulty predicting suicide.78-80 The advantage of the SAD PERSONS scale is its simplicity and adaptability to ED use. A score of 6 or more is 94% sensitive and 71% specific, when compared to formal psychiatric evaluation, in determining which patients presenting immediately after suicide attempt need hospitalization. A score of less than 6 has a negative predictive value of 95%, and no patients with low scores had died when evaluated at 6 and 12 months.5
Conduct risk assessment after metabolism of drugs and alcohol. Consider input from friends and family. When facing these dilemmas, elicit help from social workers and other professionals, but formulate an autonomous conclusion regarding suicide risk. When in doubt, do not hesitate to request emergent psychiatric consultation and advocate for hospitalization.
Once a disposition is set, medicinal options are limited in the ED and should be left to the psychiatrist. Given the low serotonin levels seen in patients who self-harm, it may seem logical to begin patients on a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). However, the initial phase of treatment with SSRIs has been shown to increase risk of suicide, and the FDA has issued warnings that antidepressant use poses a small but increased risk of suicidal ideation/attempt in children and adolescents. (See Table 2.) The data are conflicting,81-85 but recent meta-analyses have shown that benefits of antidepressants appear to be much greater than risks from suicidal ideation/suicide attempt, although comparison of benefit to risk depends on indication for treatment, age, chronicity, and study conditions.83 There does seem to be an age-dependent element, and risk of suicide with antidepressant therapy decreases as age increases.84 Benefit or no benefit, starting antidepressant therapy is a decision best left to the specialist.
Special consideration should be given to children and adolescents, who present unique challenges in management. In general, adolescents who have attempted suicide and cannot be monitored and kept safe as outpatients should be hospitalized. Suicide among adolescents is on the rise, and deciding to discharge a minor who has expressed thoughts of suicide can be a difficult decision to make.
Consider discharge only in certain adolescent patients. Before doing so, make sure that the patient is not imminently suicidal and that no medical issues or drug use are clouding the picture. Ensure that intoxication or other cause for an altered mental state is not limiting assessment of the patient. Address acute precipitants of crisis (loss of relationship, trouble with the law or school, or other disciplinary crises) and take measures to resolve them. Consider that gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths are at higher risk for harming themselves. Arrange for treatment of any underlying psychiatric condition and, when possible, arrange for a mental health evaluation prior to discharge. Be certain that the child or adolescent is not returning to an environment containing a potentially lethal means of self-harm. The patient and parents should agree to return to the ED for recurrent suicidal intent, and the physician must believe that the patient and family will follow through with the treatment plan. The child or adolescent should have strong social supports and reliable caregivers who agree and are compliant with the discharge plan.5,86,87
Most of the above discussion comes down to one question: "Can I send this person home?" In the 5-10 minute window between getting the crashing respiratory distress patient admitted and seeing the incoming MVC victims, which information is most helpful in figuring out what to do with this suicide attempt?
First and foremost, the patient must be medically stable. After that, determine level of risk. To be safe for discharge, SAD PERSONS score must be less than 6. If there is a crisis that precipitated the attempt, it must be addressed. There should be no weapons at the patient's destination, as guns in the home increase suicide risk five-fold.117 The patient must have strong social support. Ensure that a reliable family member or friend will be with him or her or immediately available until the follow-up appointment. Aim for expedient follow up, and speak with the ongoing provider. In general, if someone is cleared for discharge via psychiatric consult, send the patient home after confirming a treatment plan, return precautions, and appropriate follow up. Discharge is the perfect time to counsel and reassure patients, while documenting the presence of important factors associated with safe discharge.5,71
Opinions vary regarding the usefulness of a no-harm contract, and the most recent APA guidelines do not recommend its use.1 In a no-harm contract, the patient agrees not to hurt himself or herself in a given period of time. While it does not legally protect the physician if the patient commits suicide after discharge, a no-harm contract offers some advantages. It can help gauge the severity of the patient's suicidal ideation and intent, thus guiding risk assessment. The no-harm contract can help the physician unearth the root of a patient's suicidal ideation and may even be therapeutic for the patient. Overall, do not depend on no-harm contracts, but consider including them in the discharge plan for appropriate patients.87,89
It is hard to say whether EPs are making the right decisions regarding hospitalization and whether this has any impact on suicide rates. Unfortunately, most studies indicate that, no matter the intervention, suicide rates in patients seen for self-harm are not changing.90-92 Higher rates of suicide in self-injurers discharged from the ED have led some to suggest that psychiatric intervention be mandatory for all patients who self-harm, regardless of perceived risk.92 However, there are limited mental health services for suicidal patients, specifically consultants for evaluation, disposition, and follow up of suicidal patients in the ED.93 Inevitably, some patients are lost to follow up. A large study found that only two-thirds of patients referred for psychiatric treatment at outpatient facilities received the treatment planned by the consulting psychiatrist.94 Mobile crisis teams have been created and have resulted in improvement in follow up, but did not enhance symptomatic or functional outcomes or likelihood of outpatient psychiatric care.95 This lack of improvement in critical outcomes is largely dependent on what happens outside of the ED. But inside the ED, there lies a unique opportunity to affect suicide rates. When potentially suicidal patients come to the ED, take the opportunity to listen. If they are low risk, send them home, but point them in the right direction.
As with many aspects of emergency medicine, the area of self-harm is fraught with medicolegal peril. Since 1998, suicide and attempted suicide make up 15% of malpractice claims by cause of loss, in the United States.96,97 Suicide is notoriously difficult to predict, even for psychiatrists, so document thoroughly, especially in regard to risk assessment. Note the reasons for chosen management and disposition, as well as discussions with psychiatric consultants and provision of resources.
Above all, be a patient advocate. A sympathetic approach with the patient and family will be well remembered, no matter what the outcome.
What can emergency providers due to prevent suicide and close the practice gap? A certain comfort level is needed to tackle such a sensitive topic. Here are some suggestions. Be able to define self-harm and all its permutations. Recognize there is a difference between suicidal behavior and deliberate self-harm, but that the latter can lead to the former. Be aware of the risk factors for suicide, and realize that self-harm is a huge problem. Understand the importance of risk factors such as underlying psychiatric illness, drug and alcohol use, recent life stress, social circumstances, past attempts, and active plan, but know that nothing has been shown to reliably predict future suicide. Do not forget to ask patients about protective factors. Be flexible in the clinical approach to potentially suicidal patients, as not all will be obvious with their intent, and some may be deceptive. Know the most threatening presentations. Try to limit diagnostic testing to that which is warranted by the clinical presentation, but realize that accepting psychiatric facilities may require more. Maintain a broad differential diagnosis and a high suspicion for suicidal ideation, reserving secondary gain as a rule-out diagnosis. Assure the safety of the patient and everyone around when physical restraint is needed. Commit patients against their will as a last resort. Until there is a better clinical decision rule, rely on risk assessment (using SAD PERSONS) and appropriate consultation to guide management and disposition. Be particularly careful when setting the disposition of children and adolescents. While numerous interventions have not seemed to decrease frequency of suicide in patients presenting to emergency settings with self-injurious behaviors, be resolute and structured in figuring out the best course for these patients. Appropriate recognition of suicide potential, risk assessment, and disposition are important from a medicolegal standpoint and, above all, helpful to patients.
1. Jacobs DG, Baldessarini RJ, Conwell Y, et al. Practice guideline for the assessment and treatment of patients with suicidal behaviors. Am J Psychiatry 2003;160:1-60. Available at http://www.psychiatryonline.com/pracGuide/pracGuideTopic_14.aspx.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS): Injury mortality reports, 1999 to 2006.
3. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. (September 17, 2009). The NSDUH Report: Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors among Adults. Rockville, MD.
4. McCaig LF, Nawar EN. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2004 emergency department summary. Advance data from vital and health statistics; no 372. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2006.
5. Colucciello SA. Suicide. In: Marx JA, et al, eds. Rosen's Emergency Medicine. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2006:1766-1774.
6. Frierson RL. The suicidal patient: Risk assessment, management, and documentation. Psychiatric Times 2007;24:1-3.
7. Mann JJ, Apter A, Bertolote J, et al. Suicide prevention strategiesa systemic review. JAMA 2005;294:2064-2074.
8. Risk Factors for Suicide. American Foundation for Suicide Prevention. Available at www.afsp.org.
9. Duberstein PR, Conwell Y. Personality disorders and completed suicide: A methodological and conceptual review. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 1997;4:359-376.
10. Harris EC, Barraclough B. Suicide as an outcome for mental disorders: A meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 1997;170:205-228.
11. Henriksson MM, Aro HM, Marttunen MJ, et al. Mental disorders and comorbidity in suicide. Am J Psychiatry 1993;150:935-940.
12. Conwell Y, Duberstein PR, Cox C, et al. Relationships of age and axis I diagnoses in victims of completed suicide: A psychological autopsy study. Am J Psychiatry 1996;153:1001-1008.
13. Mann JJ, Waternaux C, Haas GL, et al. Toward a clinical model of suicidal behavior in psychiatric patients. Am J Psychiatry 1999;156:181-189.
14 Isometsa ET, et a. Suicide in major depression. Am J Psychiatry 1994;151:530.
15. Winokur G, Black DW. Psychiatric and medical diagnoses as risk factors for mortality in psychiatric patients: A case control study. Am J Psychiatry 1987;144:208.
16. Asnis GM, et al. Suicidal behaviors in adult psychiatric outpatients. Part I. Description and prevalence. Am J Psychiatry 1993;150:108.
17. Haw C, Hawton K, Sutton L, et al. Schizophrenia and deliberate self-harm: A systematic review of risk factors. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2005;35:50-62.
18. Montross LP, Zisook S, Kasckow J. Suicide among patients with schizophrenia: A consideration of risk and protective factors. Ann Clin Psychiatry 2005;17:173-182.
19. Harkavy-Friedman JM, Kimhy D, Nelson EA, et al. Suicide attempts in schizophrenia: the role of command auditory hallucinations for suicide. J Clin Psychiatry 2003;64:871-874.
20. De Hert M, McKenzie K, Peuskens J. Risk factors for suicide in young people suffering from schizophrenia: A long-term follow-up study. Schizophr Res 2001;47:127-134.
21. Rossau CD, Morrensen PB. Risk factors for suicide in patients with schizophrenia: Nested case-control study. Br J Psychiatry 1997;171:355-359.
22. Nock MK, Hwang I, Sampson N, et al. Cross-national analysis of the associations among mental disorders and suicidal behavior: Findings from the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. PLoS Med 2009 Aug;6(8):e1000123. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
23. Nock MK, Hwang I, Sampson N, Ket al. Mental disorders, comorbidity and suicidal behavior: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Molecular Psychiatry 2009 Mar 31. [Epub ahead of print]
24. Inskip HM, Harris EC, Barraclough B. Lifetime risk of suicide for affective disorder, alcoholism, and schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 1998;172:35-37.
25. Murphey GE, Wetzel RD. The lifetime risk of suicide in alcoholism. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990;47:383-392.
26. Mukamal KJ, Kawachi I, Miller M, et al. Drinking frequency and quantity and risk of suicide among men. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2007; Jan 17 [Epub ahead of print].
27. Borges, G, Walters EE, Kessler RC. Associations of substance use, abuse, and dependence with subsequent suicidal behavior. Am J Epidemiol 2000;151:781-789.
28. Karch D, Krosby A, Simon T. Toxicology testing and results for suicide victims13 states, 2004. JAMA 2007;297:355-356.
29. Bryan CJ, Rudd MD. Advances in the assessment of suicide risk. J Clin Psychol 2006;62:185-200.
30. Hawton K, Harriss L, Hodder K, et al. The influence of the economic and social environment on deliberate self-harm and suicide: An ecological and person-based study. Psychol Med 2001;31:827-836.
31. Didham R, Dovey S, Reith D. Characteristics of general practitioner consultations prior to suicide: A nested case-control study in New Zealand. N Z Med J 2006;119:U2358.
32. Heikkinen ME, Isometsa ET, Marttunen MJ, et al. Social factors in suicide. Br J Psychiatry 1995;167: 747-753.
33. Beautrais AL. A case control study of suicide and attempted suicide in older adults. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2002;32:1-9.
34. Luoma JB, Pearson JL. Suicide and marital status in the United States, 1991-1996: Is widowhood a risk factor? Am J Public Health 2002;92:1518-1522.
35. Rudd MD, Joiner T, Rajab MH. Relationships among suicide ideators, attempters, and multiple attempters in a young-adult sample. J Abnorm Psychol 1996;105:541-550.
36. Joiner T, Walker R, Rudd MD, et al. Scientizing and routinizing the outpatient assessment of suicidality. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 1999;30: 447-453.
37. Malone KM, Oquendo MA, Haas GL, et al. Protective factors against suicidal acts in major depression: Reasons for living. Am J Psychiatry 2000;157:1084-1088.
38. Turvey CL, Conwell Y, Jones MP, et al. Risk factors for late-life suicide: A prospective, community-based study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2002;10:398-406.
39. Tsang MT, Simpson JC, Fleming JA. Epidemiology of suicide. Int Rev Psychiatry 1992;4:117-129.
40. Neeleman J, Halpern D, Leon D, et al. Tolerance of suicide, religion, and suicide rates: an ecological and individual study in 19 Western countries. Psychol Med 1997;27:1165-1171.
41. Clark DC, Fawcett J. The relation of parenthood to suicide. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994;51:160.
42. Wingate LR, Joiner TE, Walker RL, et al. Empirically informed approaches to topics in suicide risk assessment. Behav Sci Law 2004;22:651-665.
43. Henneman PL, Mendoza R, Lewis RJ: Prospective evaluation of emergency department medical clearance. Ann Emerg Med 1994;24:672.
44. Folse VN, Eich KN, Hall AM, et al. Detecting suicide risk in adolescents and adults in an ED. J Psychiatr Nurs Ment Health Services 2006;44:22-29.
45. Giordano R, Stichler JF. Improving suicide risk assessment in the emergency department. J Emerg Nurs 2009;35:22-26. Epub 2008 Jul 3.
46. Patterson WM, Dohn HH, Bird J, et al. Evaluation of suicidal patients: The SAD PERSONS scale. Psychosomatics 1983;24:343-349.
47. Hockberger RS, Rothstein RJ. Assessment of suicide potential by nonpsychiatrists using the SAD PERSONS SCORE. J Emerg Med 1988;6:99-107.
48. Dennis M, Evans A, Wakefield P, et al. The psychosocial assessment of deliberate self harm: Using clinical audit to improve the quality of the service. Emerg Med J 2001;18:448–450.
49. National Strategy for Suicide Prevention. Goals and objectives for action. Available at: www.mentalhealth.org/suicideprevention.
50. Patterson P, Whittington R, Bogg J. Testing the effectiveness of an educational intervention aimed at changing attitudes to self harm. J Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing 2007;14:100-105.
51. McAllister M, Billett S, Moyle W, et al. Use of a think-aloud procedure to explore the relationship between clinical reasoning and solution-focused training in self-harm for Emergency Nurses. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2009;16:121-128.
52. McAllister M, Moyle W, Billett S, et al. 'I can actually talk to them now': Qualitative results of an educational intervention for Emergency Nurses caring for clients who self-injure. J Clin Nurs 2009;18:2838-28345. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
53. Dennis M, Beach M, Evans PA, et al. An examination of the accident and emergency management of deliberate self-harm. J Accid Emerg Med 1997;14:311–315.
54. Kapur N, House A, Creed F, et al. Management of deliberate self poisoning in adults in four teaching hospitals: A descriptive study. BMJ 1998;316:831–832.
55. Hurry J, Storey P. Assessing young people who deliberate harm themselves. Br J Psychiatry 2000;176:126–131.
56. Black D, Creed F. Assessment of self-poisoning patients by psychiatrist and junior medical staff. J Roy Soc Med 1988;81:97–99.
57. O'Dwyer FG, D'Alton A, Pearce JB. Adolescent self-harm patients: Audit of assessment in an accident and emergency department. BMJ 1991;303:629–630.
58. Cooper JB, Lawlor MP, Hiroeh U, et al. Factors that influence emergency department doctors' assessment of suicide risk in deliberate self-harm patients. Eur J Emerg Med 2003;10:283-287.
59. Suokas J, Suominen K, Lönnqvist J. The attitudes of emergency staff toward attempted suicide patients: A comparative study before and after establishment of a psychiatric consultation service. Crisis 2009;30:161-165.
60. Suokas J, Suominen K, Lönnqvist J. Psychological distress and attitudes of emergency personnel towards suicide attempters. Nord J Psychiatry 2008;62:144-146.
61. Suominen K, Suokas J, Lönnqvist J. Attitudes of general hospital emergency room personnel towards attempted suicide patients. Nord J Psychiatry 2007;61:387-392.
62. McCarthy L, Gijbels H. An examination of emergency department nurses' attitudes towards deliberate self-harm in an Irish teaching hospital. Int Emerg Nurs 2010;18:29-35. Epub 2009 Jul 30.
63. McCann TV, Clark E, McConnachie S, et al. Deliberate self-harm: emergency department nurses' attitudes, triage and care intentions. J Clin Nurs 2007;16:1704-1711. Epub 2007 Apr 24.
64. McCann T, Clark E, McConnachie S, et al. Accident and Emergency Nurses' attitudes towards patients who self-harm. Accid Emerg Nurs 2006;14:4-10. Epub 2005 Dec 5.
65. Pearsall A, Ryan T. A&E and mental health liaison. In: Duffy D, Ryan T, eds. New Approaches to Preventing Suicide: A manual for practitioners. Jessica Kingsley, London;2004.
66. Hart C, Colley R, Harrison A. Using a risk assessment matrix with mental health patients in emergency departments. Emergency Nurse 2005;12:21-28.
67. Arbuthnot L, Gillespie M. Self-harm: Reviewing psychological assessment in emergency departments. Emergency Nurse 2005;12:20-24.
68. Pompili M, Girardi P, Ruberto A, et al. Emergency staff reactions to suicidal and self-harming patients. Eur J Emerg Med 2005;12:169-178.
69. McAllister M, Creedy D, Moyle W, et al. Nurses attitudes towards clients who self harm. J Advanced Nursing 2006;40:578-586.
70. Sun FK, Long A, Boore J et al. Nursing people who are suicidal on psychiatric wards in Taiwan: Action/interaction strategies. J Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing 2005;12:275-282.
71. Borg K. Self harm and danger to others. In: Adams JG, et al, eds. Emergency Medicine, 1st ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2008:2057-2062.
72. American College of Emergency Physicians: Clinical Policy: Critical Issues in the Diagnosis and Management of the Adult Psychiatric Patient in the Emergency Department. Available at http://acep.org/webportal/PracticeResources/ClinicalPolicies.
73. Eagles D, Stiell IG, Clement CM, et al. International survey of emergency physicians' priorities for clinical decision rules. Acad Emerg Med 2008;15:177-82.
74. Cooper J, Kapur N, Mackway-Jones K. A comparison between clinicians' assessment and the Manchester Self-Harm Rule: A cohort study. Emerg Med J 2007;24:720-721.
75. Hatcher S. The Manchester Self Harm Rule had good sensitivity but poor specificity for predicting repeat self harm or suicide. Evid Based Med 2007;12:89.
76. Cooper J, Kapur N, Dunning J, et al. A clinical tool for assessing risk after self-harm. Ann Emerg Med 2006;48:459-466.
77. Mitchell AJ, Dennis M. Self harm and attempted suicide in adults: 10 practical questions and answers for emergency department staff. Emerg Med J 2006;23:251-255.
78. Pokorny AD. Prediction of suicide in psychiatric patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1983;40:249.
79. Harris MR, et al. Completed suicides and emergency psychiatric evaluations: The Louisville experience. J Kentucky Med Assoc 2000;98:210.
80. Brown GK. A Review of Suicide Assessment Measures for Intervention Research with Adults and Older Adults. Available at www.nimh.nih.gov/research/adultsuicide.pdf.
81. Lapierre YD. Suicidality with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: Valid claim? J Psychiatry Neurosci 2003;28:340-347.
82. Hetrick S, Merry S, McKenzie J, et al. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for depressive disorders in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;CD004851.
83. Bridge JA, Iyengar S, Salary CB, et al. Clinical response and risk for reported suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in pediatric antidepressant treatment: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2007;297:1683-1696.
84. Stone M, Laughren T, Jones ML, et al. Risk of suicidality in clinical trials of antidepressants in adults: Analysis of proprietary data submitted to US Food and Drug Administration. BMJ 2009;339:b2880.
85. Tandt H, Audenaert K, van Heeringen C. [SSRIs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) and suicidality in adults, adolescents and children]. Tijdschr Psychiatr 2009;51:387-393. Review. Dutch.
86. Kennedy SP, Baraff LJ, Suddath RL, et al. Emergency department management of suicidal adolescents. Ann Emerg Med 2004;43:452-460.
87. Rund DA, Hutzler JC. Behavioral disorders: Emergency assessment. In: Tintinalli JE, et al, eds. Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide, 6th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2004:1814-1816.
88. Simon RI. Gun safety management with patients at risk for suicide. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2007;37:518-526.
89. Stanford EJ, Goetz RR, Bloom JD. The no harm contract in the emergency assessment of suicidal risk. J Clin Psychiatry 1994;55:344.
90. Crawford MJ, Thomas O, Khan N, et al. Psychosocial interventions following self-harm: Systematic review of their efficacy in preventing suicide. Br J Psychiatry 2007;190:11-17.
91. Howson MA, Yates KM, Hatcher S. Re-presentation and suicide rates in emergency department patients who self-harm. Emerg Med Australas 2008;20:322-327.
92. Crandall C, Fullerton-Gleason L, Aguero R, et al. Subsequent suicide mortality among emergency department patients seen for suicidal behavior. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13:435-442. Epub 2006 Mar 10.
93. Baraff LJ, Janowicz N, Asarnow JR. Survey of California emergency departments about practices for management of suicidal patients and resources available for their care. Ann Emerg Med 2006;48:452-458, 458.e1-2. Epub 2006 Aug 21.
94. Nordentoft M. Prevention of suicide and attempted suicide in Denmark. Epidemiological studies of suicide and intervention studies in selected risk groups. Dan Med Bull 2007;54:306-369.
95. Currier GW, Fisher SG, Caine ED. Mobile crisis team intervention to enhance linkage of discharged suicidal emergency department patients to outpatient psychiatric services: A randomized controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med 2010;17:36-43. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
96. Meyer DJ. Psychiatric malpractice and administrative inquiries of alleged physician misconduct. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2006;29:615-628.
97. Professional Risk Management Services, Inc. Data from claims by cause of loss. Available at: http://www.scpsych.org/images/us_claims.pdf.